"The interesting one is motion urging reconsideration of the order denying bail. Apparently Melville's ruling is not based on facts from the grand jury transcripts. Melville earlier based his ruling on 'that michael would join family in brazil'. However according to this motion nothing in the grand jury supports that statement. The defense also attacks the use of 93 case and state, despite two grand juries being convened, neither chose to indict. Apparently Melville also assumed allegations contained in the indictment to be true when denying bail reduction and the defence argues that this is (improper). The defense wants a hearing on this issue. Melville is going to have a hard time justifying his decision. "