Home

News

MJEOL BULLET

Raymone Bain: Is she or Isn't She? - MiniB#57

Tag it:

Written by MJEOL

Tuesday, 22 January 2008

Over the past few days, rumors circulated by a few online news sites claimed that Michael Jackson spokesperson and general manager Raymone Bain was o-u-t.

According to various MJ fan sites including www.jacksonland.it, Bain says the rumors were not true and she had never so much as heard of one of the main online news sites spreading the rumor.

The following is the brief response apparently from Bain about this latest issue:

I have never heard of this website and the rumor is not true.

Thanks for your inquiry.

Best.

Raymone

Bain has certainly had to smack down her fair share of rumors, most of which were pushed by the online wing of Fox news; the gossipmonger who shall remain nameless...for now(as if you don't already know).

Rumors of Bain's demise creep up ever so often for whatever reason. And thus far, the aftermath of the yapping has always resulted in her still on the job despite the reports.

-MJEOL

Comments

Add New

Eric Pelow

|2008-01-29 22:54:01

Also Roger Friedman is a man who is honest. He tends to be proven right. U
should never forget his reporting of the court trial. It was the only honest
media coverage out there.
He knew about Thriller 25 before anyone else

Reply | Quote

antoinemarionette - Won't they ever stop?

|2008-02-02 04:21:01

It's just more feeble attempts to attack an unshakable fan base; to create
mini-scandals and fuel speculation. It's done on a daily basis, it's incredible!
It truly shows how important Michael Jackson is if they feel he must be under
such constant assault. There were at least 5 baseless rumors of this kind
circulating last week alone. Most of them appear to be generated by
Murdock-owned Fox Network TV and Newspapers. And yet it all rolls off the fans,
and MJ, like water on a duck's back.

Reply | Quote

admin - Friedman right? Please....

|2008-02-03 19:05:48

Friedman has been consistently wrong on a number of reports. Just because he
chose not to turn a blind eye toward what was obvious during the trial doesn't
mean we should disregard the many, many times he's been dead wrong about a
number of things since. He doesn't get a free pass just because he happened to
agree with our view of the past trial.

As for knowing about Thriller25, please.
That's not enough reason to gulp up every piece of $hit Friedman puts out. He
does what Dimond and a whole heck of a lot of people do when talking about Mike:
they put in just enough information in the report and hope to use that part to
make people believe the other part of the report that is totally false,
unconfirmed, or wholly unsubstantiated.

If you're right 2 times out of 10,
that doesn't automatically mean you know what you're talking about.

Reply | Quote