<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Dieter Wiesner Lawsuit Dismissed - MiniBullet#53</title>
		<description>Comments for Dieter Wiesner Lawsuit Dismissed - MiniBullet#53 at http://site2.mjeol.com , comment 1 to 4 out of 4 comments</description>
		<link>http://site2.mjeol.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 00:40:58 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://site2.mjeol.com/mjeol-bullet/dieter-wiesner-lawsuit-dismissed-minibullet-53.html#comment-99</link>
			<description>It's important to me to make sure as many people as possible know that he was acquitted after false molestation allegations. 

The regular media continues to bring that up, and I will always remind people - whether they are Jackson fans or not - that he was acquitted after FALSE allegations. It's important to myself and many other people.  ;) - Administrator</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:14:56 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://site2.mjeol.com/mjeol-bullet/dieter-wiesner-lawsuit-dismissed-minibullet-53.html#comment-205</link>
			<description>It's important to me to make sure as many people as possible know that he was acquitted after false molestation allegations. 

The regular media continues to bring that up, and I will always remind people - whether they are Jackson fans or not - that he was acquitted after FALSE allegations. It's important to myself and many other people.  ;) - Administrator</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:14:56 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mentioning allegations of molestation</title>
			<link>http://site2.mjeol.com/mjeol-bullet/dieter-wiesner-lawsuit-dismissed-minibullet-53.html#comment-98</link>
			<description>I was just wondering why whenever an article or comment about MJ is written or posted writers have to mention the false allegations.  Could that part be left out, everyone knows about them by now and to keep mentioning them is not necessary. - gt</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 01:03:05 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mentioning allegations of mole</title>
			<link>http://site2.mjeol.com/mjeol-bullet/dieter-wiesner-lawsuit-dismissed-minibullet-53.html#comment-204</link>
			<description>I was just wondering why whenever an article or comment about MJ is written or posted writers have to mention the false allegations.  Could that part be left out, everyone knows about them by now and to keep mentioning them is not necessary. - gt</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 01:03:05 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
