[b] Michael Jackson’s Attorneys Seek To Delay Trial[/b] POSTED: 3:23 pm PST December 13, 2004 LOS ANGELES — Michael Jackson’s
Day: December 13, 2004
Why Did Prosecutors Abandon Initial Charges Filed Dec 2003? MB #229
Why Did Prosecutors Abandon Initial Charges Filed Dec 2003? MJEOL Bullet #229 Another strange issue in a chain of incredulous allegations in the Michael Jackson case concerns the various stories being told by the accusing family. As you remember, prosecutors filed one set of charges against Jackson in December 2003, then came out of the indictment process with an entirely different case: different charges, different counts, and a different timeline. This change was highlighted by defense attorneys in various court documents (docs). Redacted docs released November 24 2004 state that prosecutors filed charges on December 18 2003 charging Jackson with 7 counts of lewd acts and 2 counts of administering intoxicants. Besides denying the charges, Jacksons attorneys say that this initial complaint was based on interviews from the accusers mother, the accuser and his brother. They say psychologist Stan Katzwho may be in serious trouble concerning his role in this case and his involvement with Bradley Millerinterviewed the accusing family more than seven (7) times. Katz also detailed to Santa Barbara authorities what he was told by the accusing family. They also reveal that law enforcement officials interviewed the accusing family more than two dozen times. All of this is what the December 18 2003 charging complaint was based on. From the court docs:
The complaint was based on more than seven (7) interviews conducted with the complaining witnesses by Psychologist Stanley Katz. Stanley Katz detailed the alleged conduct that formed the basis of the complaint, and the complaint mirrored his interviews and reports to law enforcement. In addition, law enforcement conducted more than two (2) dozen interviews with the complaining witnesses, and more than a hundred separate interviews with other witnesses. (see Memorandum in Support of Motion for Mental Examination pg 10)