Judge Hell-Bent on Jan 31 Date, Pros. Breaking Court orders MJEOL Bullet #232 UPDATE Stinging new court docs released show prosecutors still up to their old tricks while the judge looks the other way While Court TV tries to publicly hang Michael Jackson with lies and speculation before he even steps foot inside a courtroom for a possible trialdoing a hatchet job with reporting the facts in the case today (Dec 22 2004)–its important to note that there have been some incredibly damning court documents (docs) and other evidence that has made its way to the public about the accusing family. The disgusting guilty until proven guilty attitude held by Court TV anchors cant change the fact that this case is full of incredulous allegations which make no sense given the prosecutions own set of so-called events; not to mention holes in their story the size of the Pacific Ocean. During the December 20 2004 hearing, the public learned that some 70 names on the prosecutions defective witness list are identical to names on the defenses witness list. This slashes the speculation from hack-reporters who want to claim that everyone subpoenaed by prosecutors are going to testify against Jackson. In a decision that some case observers are openly calling odd, surprising, and ridiculous, the current judge in the Michael Jackson case has refused to delay the trial date from January 31 2005. Melville recently signed search warrants on Nov 24 2004, which prosecutors didnt execute until Dec 3 2004; over a year after raiding Neverland on November 18 2003. Despite those last minute searchestantamount to invasion of privacy, say the defensethe judge has refused altogether to delay the trial in any way. Most legal analysts had previously said that the defenses request to delay the trial would be granted because of the prosecutions last minute scrambling. This can be viewed two ways: Either prosecutors got what they wanted or the judge has essentially called their bluff in face of their declarations of being ready to go forward. But the questions being raised now are whether or not this judge is hell-bent on taking this case to trial regardless of the current circumstances around it.
VENTURA COUNTY [b]Man Wrongly Convicted of Murder Sues Prosecutors [/b] Law: Efren Cruz of Oxnard seeks $120 million. He served four years for a shooting in Santa Barbara. LA Times ‘ Dec. 13, 2001 By TRACY WILSON, TIMES STAFF WRITER An Oxnard man wrongly convicted of murder has filed a Continue Reading
Efren Cruz was wrongly convicted of a crime he didn’t commit. There were certain police who knew that someone else confessed to the crime but didn’t do anything during Cruz’s trial to bring this fact to light. You can read more about the Cruz case here: http://site.mjeol.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=1080 Excepts: (pg 12) Continue Reading