Prosecutorial Misconduct History Could Affect Case? MJEOL Bullet #234 The Jackson case isnt the first one where this DAs office has been accused of prosecutorial misconduct. And further information may be made public about past settlements, not with Jackson, but with this DAs office and Santa Barbara sheriffs department In the face of prosecutors and prosecution-sympathizers trying desperately to convict Michael Jackson in the court of public opinion, there seems to be a developing story surrounding the current Santa Barbara district attorneys propensity to level criminal charges and allegations against people who, some say, are in the way of a case hes attempting to prosecute. Renewed speculation of Jackson attorney Mark Geragos being called to testify at a possible trial is running rampant. Some observers have joked that if prosecutors are expecting Geragos to testify against Jackson, that they either must be on something or should have a doctor prescribe something. Prosecutors seem to be seeking to level conspiracy charges against everyone who was present to witness the accusing familys manipulative and threatening behavior during the prosecutions timeline in an attempt to keep them from testifying against the accusing family. If thats now going to include Geragos, then they really must be on something. But theres an undercurrent of information that is bubbling up to the surface. The DAs office apparently has a history of ruining the reputations, practices, and lives of attorneys and others, who they deem as preventing them from pursuing a case, say some researchers. For example, months ago prosecution sympathizer and tabloid reporter Diane Dimond made claims on Court TVs Crier Live that her sources say prosecutors are inclined towards bringing attorney Mark Geragos into this conspiracy charge against Jackson. Now the story has changed to Geragos possibly testifying. Some may not know what to make of this Geragos rumor. For all the public knows, it could be the ramblings of a desperate wanna-be-insider using a lazy and biased tabloid reporter to further their lies. Or there could be some semblance of truth to it.