MJEOL

Part2: Sneddon has History of Prosecutorial Misconduct? MJEOL Bullet #190-B In part two of MJEOL Bullet #190, “Sneddon has History of Prosecutorial Misconduct?”, we pick up with the Gary Dunlap case and the massive documented prosecutorial misconduct by the same prosecutors now in charge of the Michael Jackson “case”.

To refresh, Dunlap is an attorney who was accused of crimes allegedly because prosecutors wanted to get him “out of the way”. He was winning too many excessive force cases against the police department. Dunlap was acquitted on all charges and is now suing Sneddon, including Deputy DAs and investigators, for $10M in federal court.

We have already learned of prior bad acts with prosecutors, including the current DA Sneddon. And, no, ‘DA’ does not stand for “dumb ass”, although some who have had run-ins with him may argue such. There is a pattern of misconduct with the way prosecutors use the media to further their cause, with the way these prosecutors handle the grand jury process and with the way they investigate a case, if we look at the evidence from Dunlap’s case.

Documents obtained by MJEOL concerning the Druyan Byrne case reveal a pattern of questionable tactics, witness intimidation, vindictive prosecution, jury pool tainting through the media and other misconduct by the Santa Barbara Sheriff’s Dept and prosecutors. The same prosecutors and police who are currently trying to railroad Michael Jackson.

Druyan, too, was investigated and charged with lewd acts upon a minor. The Santa Barbara police detective, Stuart Gardner, according to the documents, browbeat the 15 year old girl without a parent present until she gave in and “confessed”.

She later testified at the preliminary hearing that nothing happened between she and Byrne. She also submitted a declaration where she denied any such abuse.

Not to be content with that, prosecutors and police found a 20 year old drug addict and prostitute to make claims against Byrne earlier this year.

The following is PART ONE of a synopsis of events. We will be bringing you more of the synopsis soon.

Part 2: More Lies from Dateline as 1993 Shysters Resurface – MJEOL Bullet #192-B What Dateline NBC Didn’t Tell You In part two of this report concerning what Dateline didn’t tell you about the 1993 Jackson “case”, we pick up with new information about Victor Guiterrez and his close ties to Dateline NBC.

It has also been revealed that Victor Guiterrez was a “consulting producer” for the defamatory Dateline report, as you can see from a screenshot here of Dateline’s credits.

For the record, Gutierrez is the loser who was successfully sued by Jackson for claiming there was a videotape of Jackson molesting a kid. This, of course, was a malicious lie. There is some question as to who this “kid” was supposed to be. At one point, it was reported to be the maid’s son, Blanca Francia.

More Lies from Dateline as 1993 Shysters Resurface – MJEOL Bullet #192 What Dateline NBC Didn’t Tell You Since Dateline NBC has taken it upon itself to further taint the jury pool by dredging up mythical alleged “victims” from the 1990s, maybe we all need to think about why this is airing now, and what they aren’t telling the public.

The desperation tactic predicted months ago was that once the prosecution and prosecution-sympathizers started heavily pushing unfounded lies from the 93 “case” onto the public, that’s a sign that this current “case” is in very serious trouble. Well, here comes the ‘93 barrage.

Thus, the question is what has imploded with this current “case”? Could this be a pre-emptive strike to take attention off of the current accuser’s mother set to testify September 17 2004? Is this the DA’s PR firm hard at work to combat an impending crisis with the DA’s office or the Sheriff’s Department?

Josh Mankowitz has taken his career into the palm of his hands and put Dateline NBC—not known for their factual Jackson reports—on the line as well. They have given a platform to a group of peripheral players who thrive in chaos and who are masters at spreading unfounded and groundless garbage.

A number of the ghosts from 1993 have made claims of having a “strong case” back then. Not true. They claim there was “evidence” in 1993. Not true. They claim there was more than one accuser in 1993. Not true.

Sneddon has History of Prosecutorial Misconduct? 3-Part MJEOL Bullet #190 In the face of prosecutors now trying desperately to convict Michael Jackson in the court of public opinion, there seems to be a developing story surrounding the current Santa Barbara district attorney’s propensity to level criminal charges and allegations against attorneys who, some say, are in the way of a case he’s attempting to prosecute.

The DA’s office apparently has a history of ruining the reputations, practices, and lives of attorneys and others, who they deem as preventing them from pursuing a case. Just last week, prosecution sympathizer and tabloid reporter Diane Dimond made claims on Court TV’s Crier Live that her sources say prosecutors are inclined towards bringing attorney Mark Geragos into this conspiracy charge against Jackson.

This is a “case” where prosecutors seem to be leveling criminal allegations at any and everyone who was around Jackson to witness the “manipulative” and threatening behavior of the accuser’s mother.

As dubious as Dimond’s sources have proven to be, what if there is some semblance of truth to what she and her sources are claiming? It certainly wouldn’t be the first time the current district attorney, “cronies” in tow, have attempted to prosecute and/or ruin the reputations of a lawyer he sees as standing in the way of them getting what they want.