Month: May 2004

Alleged Co-conspirators Will Shred Allegations –MJEOL Bullet #139 Much ado has been made concerning the new “conspiracy” charge in the Michael Jackson “case” via doom-and-gloom forecasts from reporters too lazy to question the actual charge itself. But is the prosecution actually walking into an ambush by pursuing this self-proclaimed “case” in this way? Some say that with the added conspiracy charge, it is indeed indicative of the fact that prosecutors haven’t been able to find any corroborating evidence of the underlying charges of molestation and the administration of alcohol.

More Questions about the 1st Santa Barbara Investigation?-MJEOL Bullet #138 Did the first Santa Barbara Investigation into the molestation charges against Michael Jackson really rely solely on the previous LA Child Services report or was there more to it than the prosecution is willing to admit?

Newsflash: Unidentified, Old Underwear is not ‘Evidence’ – MJEOL Bullet #137 Quick! Somebody send out a “facts” memo and circulate it to the various media newsrooms now claiming that the seizure of decade old, unidentified underwear constitutes as “new evidence” against Michael Jackson. And make sure to include that this story is over a month old. Jeez!

New Charge Indicative of a Weak Case? – MJEOL Bullet #136 With this new asinine charge of conspiracy thrown in for good measure in the Michael Jackson “case”, questions are starting to be asked about the strength of the underlying allegation. The media and the public were led to believe by the prosecution, and their mouthpieces, that the case against Jackson wasn’t weak. So why, then, would prosecutors even attempt to fly with this new and bizarre “conspiracy” charge?