New allegations against prosecutor of Michael Jackson By K.C. Arceneaux RAW STORY COLUMNIST On April 30, 2004, the indictment against
Year: 2004
Slick Garner Files for Chapter 11 Protection
May 13 2004 SANTA BARBARA, Calif. (AP) – Embattled Buellton rancher Slick Gardner filed for bankruptcy, putting the county’s $220,000
Tabloid Reporter at Neverland before Police Raid?Bullet #141
Tabloid Reporter at Neverland before Police Raid? MJEOL Bullet #141 It has come to the attention of many people that tabloid reporter Diane Dimond has been more involved in this casethe reporting of it, the bringing about of these charges, and the knowledge of the investigationthan a great number of people have realized up until now.
Two Former Employees Start Jackson Support Site- MJEOL Bullet #140
Two Former Employees Start Jackson Support Site- MJEOL Bullet #140 Two former Jackson employees, Christian Robinson and Ian Barkley, have launched a support website called mjsinnocent.net. You may know Christian Robinson from his interview with ABCs Cynthia McFadden Feb 26 2004. Robinson was Jacksons videographer and Barkley was a photographer. Robinson was privy to devastating information that blows a gaping hole in the prosecutions case against Jackson. More about that later.
U.S. District Court judge upholds suit against DA, county
U.S. District Court judge upholds suit against DA, county By Mark Abramson — Staff Writer May 10 2004 5/10/04 A
Hot-button issues to come at Friday hearing – Santa Maria Times
Hot-button issues to come at Friday hearing By Quintin Cushner/Staff Writer Friday’s hearing in the Michael Jackson child-molestation case could
Lawyer: Ex-Jackson Workers Won’t Cut Deal
May 6, 8:38 PM EDT Lawyer: Ex-Jackson Workers Won’t Cut Deal By TIM MOLLOY Associated Press Writer LOS ANGELES (AP) — The attorney for two former employees of Michael Jackson said Thursday they won’t cut a deal with prosecutors if they are indicted.
Alleged Co-conspirators Will Shred Allegations Bullet #139
Alleged Co-conspirators Will Shred Allegations MJEOL Bullet #139 Much ado has been made concerning the new conspiracy charge in the Michael Jackson case via doom-and-gloom forecasts from reporters too lazy to question the actual charge itself. But is the prosecution actually walking into an ambush by pursuing this self-proclaimed case in this way? Some say that with the added conspiracy charge, it is indeed indicative of the fact that prosecutors havent been able to find any corroborating evidence of the underlying charges of molestation and the administration of alcohol.
More Questions about the 1st Santa Barbara Investigation?-Bullet#138
More Questions about the 1st Santa Barbara Investigation?-MJEOL Bullet #138 Did the first Santa Barbara Investigation into the molestation charges against Michael Jackson really rely solely on the previous LA Child Services report or was there more to it than the prosecution is willing to admit?
District Attorney Doesn’t Know Facts of the Case?
The Michael Jackson Case:The Effect of the New Charge, and New Attorney, And What Jackson’s Best Defense May Be By