Posted on Mon, Feb. 28, 2005 [b]Opening arguments clash over motivations of Jackson, boy’s mother[/b] BY MICHAEL MARTINEZ Chicago Tribune SANTA MARIA, Calif. – (KRT) – Opening arguments in the trial of Michael Jackson painted the pop icon alternately as a scheming pedophile who sexually touched a 13-year-old boy afflicted Continue Reading
[b]’FAMILY PREYED ON STARS'[/b] Jackson’s defence lawyer described the child sex charges against him as “bogus” and said his accusers were people who preyed on celebrities for money. In his opening statements, Thomas Mesereau said: “I am hear to tell you the charges are fictitious, bogus and never happened.” The Continue Reading
Opening statements begin today (Feb 28 2005) in the Michael Jackson so-called “case”. FEB 28 2005 (7:51 PM EST) – The defense, who will continue their opening statements tomorrow, began to completely take a part the prosecution’s allegation against Jackson today. There were more than a few observers who agreed Continue Reading
Opening statements begin today (Feb 28 2005) in the Michael Jackson so-called “case”. Already from media time-filling conjecture from pundits, you can tell they have no understanding about the basic facts of this “case”. For example, one pundit was heard asking a question as to whether or not the defense Continue Reading
[b]Teen accuser told investigators he knew more about “birds and bees” than Michael Jackson.[/b] Listen to Drudge breaking the news on his Sunday, Feb 27 2005 show: https://site2.mjeol.com/modules/mydownloads/singlefile.php?cid=2&lid=341 FEBRUARY 27–The Los Angeles boy who has accused Michael Jackson of molestation told investigators that the singer was a naif when it Continue Reading
By 
