CLICK OVER TO [url=http://www.drudgereport.com/flash3jja.htm]DRUDGE’S WEBSITE[/url] FOR PIC MEET THE NEW ‘JANET JACKSON’; ACCUSER’S MOM REVEALED Mon Jan 31 205 21:00:34 ET **Exclusive** This is the face of Michael Jackson’s biggest nightmare: Janet Arvizo, the mother of the boy who alleges he was abused. The media may be shielding her face […]Continue Reading
[b]Jackson: Truth will vindicate me[/b] Jury selection begins Monday in pop singer’s molestation trial Monday, January 31, 2005 Posted: 9:37 AM EST (1437 GMT) (CNN) — Pop singer Michael Jackson issued a video statement Sunday, a day before jury selection begins in his child molestation trial, calling leaks from the […]Continue Reading
[b]Jackson Speaks Out[/b] Saturday, January 29, 2005 By Geraldo Rivera In the Michael Jackson (search) case a jury is about to be empanelled. This comes fresh on the heels of a damaging and destructive leak from the supposedly secret grand jury. These allegations, in my opinion, unfairly taint the jury […]Continue Reading
Opposition to DA’s Motion in Limine Re: Evidence Code Section 402 Issues Excerpts: (pg 8) It is entirely proper for defense counsel to take issue with the motivations of the prosecution, in light of the facts of the case. The fact is that Mr. Sneddon did get personally involved in […]Continue Reading
BREAKING NEWS: Prosecutors Threatening the Defense? JAN 29 2005 — Has the prosecution in the Michael Jackson “case” gone off the deep-end? In recently released court papers, the defense has put the prosecution on high blast for apparently threatening to release “everything [Mr. Sneddon] knows about the defendant” if the […]Continue Reading
Much Ado about an Art book and Adult Material? MJEOL Bullet #241
Besides it being ridiculous that it would be a big deal if pornography was found in a grown mans house, prosecutors are allegedly trying to turn a readily available, legal art book into pornography as well to cover-up/explain-away the fact that no child porn was found at Jacksons ranch
JAN 28 2005 — The prosecution or prosecution-sympathizers continue to leak information (info) to their favorite tabloid reporter Diane Dimond. On Jan 25 2005, the tabloid reporter claimed to have a bombshell about an art book allegedly taken from Jacksons home in 1993. No, thats not a typo.
Dimond ran all over the place the Today Show, Crier Live etc.waving this book in front of the camera that she claims her sources said was seized 11 years ago. Not to be left out of such nonsense, Crier allowed Dimond the platform for which to report about this art book and allowed the speculation of what it may .could might mean to Michael Jackson; complete with experts whove never met or talked to Jackson, nor know if the book actually belongs to him.
Dimond suggests the book The Boy: A Photographic Essay is somehow incriminating. But what is it about this book that is so sinister when applied to Jackson? A little research about the book yields important info not highlighted in certain reports.
The book was published in Sept 1964 and features photographs taken on the set of the movie Lord of the Flies. Lord of the Flies is based on the book of the same name and is required reading in most schools. It’s a movie about a plane full of children who are shipwrecked on an island and are left to fend for themselves. Without getting into a total breakdown of the book, it basically illustrates a point the author was making about how environment can shape human behavior.Continue Reading
Opposition to DA’s Request to Admit Seized Evid. Of “Erotic Material” Excerpts: (pg2-3) The problem with the prosecution’s argument is that the prosecution has failed to establish a foundation that these materials are relevant to material issues in this case. Instead they are seeking to introduce anything that might sway […]Continue Reading
BREAKING NEWS UPDATE #4: JAN 28 2005 — Major blows to the prosecution and to Martin Bashir by way of new court rulings today in the Jackson “case”. While the judge will allow adult material to be shown to the jury, he will not allow large amonts of irrelevant or […]Continue Reading
Leak Investigation Too Little Too Late As Pros. Try to Shake Blame? MJEOL Bullet #240 The Santa Barbara Sheriffs Dept. is up to its old tricks, launching an investigation into who leaked the grand jury transcripts to the media. But could this investigation be too little too late, as some observers already think their pals in the DAs office are responsible? Also, a desperate attempt by a tabloid reporter to take suspicion off of her highly placed sources JAN 27 2005 — The Santa Barbara Sheriffs Department (SBSD) has recently announced an investigation into who leaked sealed court documents to the ABC Newss Cynthia McFadden. This comes weeks after the leaks to the Court TV-backed website thesmokinggun and days after the ABC Primetime Live airing of the exact testimony from the grand jury transcripts. Both the prosecution and the Santa Barbara Sheriffs Dept. announced this investigation in a joint statement. Some criticize this move as comical and absolutely ridiculous. They claim to want to find a real culprit but give the appearance that the SBSD and the DA are teaming up to investigate. A great number of people see these leaks as coming from the prosecution. They are the total beneficiaries of these types of leaks. The reason some observers suggest that this apparent pairing is problematic is because if the leaks are coming from the prosecution, the SBSD wont so much as give them a second look during their investigation. Others have bluntly stated they are concerned prosecutors may be trying to cover their asses on this issue. Some case observers have flat out said this selective investigation could be a major PR job on behalf of prosecutors because the leaks may have backfired for them. It is important to note these pro-prosecution leaks also conveniently came after people were coming out the woodwork to give interviews with the media concerning their own run-ins with the family, and info about the familys incredibly shady, possibly felonious past. True, an enormous amount of information was leaked. But some of what was leaked, although salacious, showed blaring holes and illogical stories in the prosecutions case.Continue Reading