[b]Vital [Jackson] Video Tapes May Be Missing[/b] Monday, March 07, 2005 By Roger Friedman Something’s wrong in the world of
Month: March 2005
How Did Bashir Get the Jackson Interview? – Matthew Norman’s Media Diary
Matthew Norman’s Media Diary 07 March 2005 – With Martin Bashir facing a possible contempt charge for refusing to answer
Jackson Accuser Was Living Life of Luxury – AP
Jackson Accuser Was Living Life of Luxury Sun Mar 6, 1:46 PM ET Top Stories – AP By LINDA DEUTSCH,
Defense Cross-examination of Davellin Arvizo Day 1
This contains Mesereau’s cross-examination of the accuser’s sister on March 4 2005. His cross examination begins on page 798 of
Did the Media Mediate Abuse Case Against Michael Jackson?
[b] Did the Media Mediate Abuse Case Against Michael Jackson? [/b] [i]Written by Obiechena Sunday, 06 March 2005[/i] Over the
Sister Testimony Dismantled, Family Not Coerced on Video – MiniBullet #10
Sister Testimony Dismantled, Family Not Coerced on Video MiniBullet #10 MARCH 6 2005 — Michael Jacksons defense attorney Tom Mesereau is methodically dismantling the testimony of the accusers sister, Davellin Arvizo, under cross-examination (cross), which began Friday (March 4 2005) and will continue March 7 2005. Like we and many case observers predicted, the cross and not the direct testimony (direct) would be the true test as to whether the sister was credible or not. Whats more is courtroom observers have come to the conclusion concerning the veracity of her claims themselves while sitting there witnessing it. If you remember, under direct examination many courtroom observers, analysts, and pundits claimed that the sister came off as a credible witness and wondered how and/or if the defense could question some of her claims. After the first day of D. Arvizos testimony, every nut-job, pro-prosecution reporter and hysterical prosecutor claimed it was over, that she sister was credible, and that her testimony was strong. March 4 2005 began for the prosecution with them continuing their direct examination of D. Arvizo. During direct, they played the never before seen video of the Arvizo family saying wonderful things about Michael Jackson, made Feb 19-20 2003. Reportedly, the video is about 65 minutes long. For clarification, the rebuttal video played in court March 4 has never been broadcast. It was NOT a part of the 2003 Jackson rebuttal video Take Two: The Footage You Were Never Meant to See. That Take Two interview was broadcast on the Fox network. As you know, and like MJEOL as well as the fan community have been saying since last year, the prosecutor has yet to explain why Jacksons people would kidnap a family of four to get them to do a video to rehabilitate his image, and then not even show that video to the public. Bradley Miller, who was interviewed by MSNBCs Dan Abrams before he was subpoenaed says the reason why the familys interview wasnt used as part of the Take Two footage was because the mother didnt want to sign a release stating that she gave up her rights to collect money to appear in the video.
My dad, Michael – Allegedly the interview mother got $4,000 to give
[b]Feb 8, 2003[/b] Daily Mail [UK – London] By: David Gardner [b]My dad, Michael[/b] [i]Cancer boy”s mother tells how he
Accuser’s Family Set [Jackson] Up – FOX
[b]Accuser’s Family Set [Jackson] Up[/b] Saturday, March 05, 2005 By Roger Friedman What I’ve tried to tell you all along
MJ LAWYERS ‘HAPPY’ – Sister Admits No One told Them They Couldn’t Leave
[b]MJ LAWYERS ‘HAPPY'[/b] Michael Jackson’s defence team has indicated it is happy with the way in which the singer’s child
Jury sees ‘rebuttal’ video of family – SBNP
[b]Jury sees ‘rebuttal’ video of family[/b] 3/5/05 By DAWN HOBBS NEWS-PRESS STAFF WRITER Boy’s relatives shown praising singer Jurors in