The defense hits upon what most observers have noticed as well: the accusing family changed the dates of their accusations. [b]Defense’s Status Report Re: Discovery[/b] Excerpt: The defense pointed out that chronologies prepared by those other than the district attorneys were important because the dates regarding the alleged molestation in the original complaint were different from those in the Indictment. The dates are different because the Doe family apparently provided different dates in their interviews before the criminal complaint was filed and then changed the dates for the grand jury proceedings. The chronologies are crucial to the defense because they will reveal not only the inconsistent dates of the alleged molestation, but also of the inconsistent facts and dates regarding other alleged acts of the Indictment. The defense requests that the prosecution produce all such chronologies (hand-written and typed). pg 3 :popcorn

Leave a Reply