Category: HOT DOC

UPDATE: Opposition to District Attorney’s Motion to Limit Introduction of Evidence of Prior Litigation Involving the Doe Family Explosive new

In January 2005 the court released redacted defense documents saying that, according to the defense, the prosecution was threating to

In a defense court filing overlooked by most in the media from November 2004, the defense has evidence that checks

Jury Questionnaire in the Michael Jackson “case” via the website http://www.sbscpublicaccess.org/ :nav Juror Questionnaire

Opposition to DA’s Motion in Limine Re: Evidence Code Section 402 Issues Excerpts: (pg 8) It is entirely proper for

Opposition to DA’s Request to Admit Seized Evid. Of “Erotic Material” Excerpts: (pg2-3) The problem with the prosecution’s argument is

Opposition to District Attorney’s Motion for Order Allowing Use of Expert Testimony on the Subject of Child Abuse Trauma (by

Motion in Limine to Exclude Reference to Books, Magazines, Photographs (pg 2-3) Mr Jackson’s Motion is based on the following

Mr. Jackson’s Motion in Limine to Limit Uncharged Conspirator Hearsay (pg 2) (1) An order prohibiting the attorneys for plaintiff

Motion for Order Allowing Individual Sequestered Voir Dire of Jurors (pg3) 2. The grand jury transcripts were released on “Primetime