FIRST REPORT CLEARED JACKO NY Post By BARRY BORTNICK December 10, 2003 — LOS ANGELES – Cops and county social
Candidates line up for retiring judge’s seat
Candidates line up for retiring judge’s seat By Quintin Cushner — Staff Writer 12/9/03 At least five Santa Barbara County
D.A. Dismisses another Govt Agencys Report? MJEOL Bullet #38
[b]D.A. Dismisses another Govt Agencys Report? MJEOL Bullet #38[/b] A governmental agency doing an independent investigation has previously vindicated
Rush Limbaugh Weighs in on the Jackson Case
[b]What If Michael Didn’t Do It?[/b] [i]December 9, 2003 Rush Limbaugh[/i] I urge you to read this story from TheSmokingGun.com,
Investigators: Allegations Against Jackson Unfounded Bullet #37
[b]Internal Memo: Allegations Against Jackson Unfounded MJEOL Bullet #3[/b] In a bombshell report out today (Dec 9), thesmokinggun.com has found an internal memo which concludes that the allegations of neglect and sexual abuse leveled against Jackson are in fact unfounded. Both the LAPD-Wilshire Division and the Department of Children & Family Services did the investigation. It further states that the mother confirmed that Jackson was like a father to the children and a part of her family. As to the actual allegations and the media skewing Jacksons words, the mother also confirmed that her children are never left alone with the entertainer. The fact that Jackson is seldom, if ever, alone with any child is also confirmed by Jackson family attorney, Brian Oxman. Oxman appeared on Fox news show hosted by Bill OReilly earlier this year and addressed this subject.He stated:
They always have a female attendant present. What Martin Bashir didnt show you was the female attendants or the adult attendants who were present. Michael has them there to protect not only the children but himself as well.
Another issue coming as a result of this information is the timeline when abuse was supposed to have taken place. When reports first broke of this latest allegation, it was also reported that the accuser was 12 when the alleged abuse was suppose to have taken place. The accuser recently turned 14 this year. Thus, if this is the case, the alleged abuse had to have taken place [b]before[/b] the mother, the accuser, the brother and the sister of the accuser signed legal documents stating that no sexual abuse happened at all. Make no mistake about it: this is very damaging to the prosecutions case. At the very leastregardless of the excuses commentators sympathetic to the prosecution try to make to explain away the conclusion of the investigationit shows a propensity for this accuser to tell lies, possibly at the mothers request. :4pinnedRead the FULL report >>
Internal Memo: Case Against Jackson Unfounded
DECEMBER 9–A confidential investigation by Los Angeles police and child welfare officials concluded earlier this year that allegations Michael Jackson
Geraldine Hughes does interview with mjdatabank.com
The website mjdatabank.com has done an interview with Geraldine Hughes about the Michael Jackson set-up of 1993. Hughes will release
Accuser’s Family Has a History of Lying?
Jackson hired Geragos in February when the pop star realized that an upcoming BBC documentary was focusing uncomfortably on his
Is Tom Sneddon Incompetent?
A report corrects a colossal mistake made by the Prosecutor of Santa Barbara, Tom Sneddon during that now infamous press conference: ============================================ One particular thread of the Michael Jackson case is strikingly instructive on how this can occur — even in the face of the news media’s prompt and repeated attempts to root out the mistake. In this instance, the error involves not some peripheral narrative detail, but an issue fundamental to the prosecution: Does a California law adopted after an abortive 1993 investigation into allegations that the singer had molested a young boy allow prosecutors to compel an alleged child victim to testify? [b]The answer is no. There is no such law.[/b] If you thought there was, you’re in extensive company — including a large number of the callers discussing the case on AM talk radio and a clutch of reporters and commentators. Jeffery Toobin, CNN’s legal-affairs analyst, told colleague Miles O’Brien later that day, as they covered Jackson’s surrender to authorities. O’Brien: “As a parent, I can’t imagine anybody trying to compel an 11-year-old … to testify in court. I’m sure a lot of people would have problems with that.” [b]Toobin: “No, it can’t be done under California law. In fact, the law is broader than that. You can’t even compel an adult victim of a sexual assault to testify. That statement by the district attorney is simply wrong. There can be no compulsion.”[/b] ====================================== I guess in all of his gleefulness, he just….forgot? You be the judge. :arrow Read FULL Story >>
Prosecution and Accusers Family Leaking Information? Bullet #36
[b]Prosecution and Accusers Family Leaking Information? MJEOL Bullet #36[/b] The New York Times published a rather scathing article questioning whether or not the prosecution in the Jackson case actually [i]has[/i] a case against the singer. In the Times article, its reported that the tip line set up by the sheriffs department has yielded little to no viable leads and no new allegations against Jackson. Sgt Chris Pappas is quoted in the article as saying At this point in time, none [calls] have clearly identified new cases for independent investigation. A second issue surfacing now is reports saying this latest accusers brother actually witnessed the alleged molestation on one occasion. This new information is also being probed by some in the media who have already been snake-bitten by false information from faulty sources. In a discussion on MSNBCs Scarborough Country (Dec 5 2003), it is reported that Lisa Bloom actually let it slip that the accusing family contacted Court TV proclaiming that the brother of the accuser was going to testify that he witnessed the alleged abuse by Jackson once. It is incredibly suspicious why this family would be contacting any media outlets to begin with. There is also a question as to if the D.As office urged them to contact Court TV or if they acted on their own volition. These actions could have been set into motion in order to turn the media tide back in the prosecutions favor. Read Full Report >> Transcript of that show is now posted at the MJEOL forums: :arrow [url=http://forum.mjeol.com/index.php?showtopic=11595]Scarborough Country Dec 5-Lisa Bloom admits leak from family[/url]