Thursday, January 13 2005 Statement of Attorney Thomas A. Mesereau, Jr. – January 13, 2005 Thursday, 13 January 2005 (Approved
Year: 2005
Outrage Over Media Irresponsibility – MJJF Jackson fans sound off
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE (LONG FORM) LOS ANGELES, CA, 1/12/05 Outrage Over Media Irresponsibility Michael Jackson fans from around the globe
[Jackson]: Rush Hour Star, Director to Testify for defense – Fox
_ [Jackson]: ‘Rush Hour’ Star, Director to Testify Thursday, January 13, 2005 By Roger Friedman I’m told that Michael Jackson’s
More Disgusting Leaks from a Frightened Set of Desperate Prosecutors – MB#236
More Disgusting Leaks from a Frightened Set of Desperate Prosecutors – MJEOL Bullet #236 JAN 13 2005 — Just when you thought prosecutors in the Michael Jackson “case” couldn’t get any worse, they go and surprise you. After leaking sealed court documents to a website, someone has now leaked testimony from the grand jury transcripts; three guesses as to who it was. After being handed somewhat of a defeat yesterday (Jan 12 2005) by the judge–who ruled that prosecutors will have to stand or fall on this current “case” alone for the time being–now comes more back-alley leaks. This time to ABC News. Cynthia McFadden is reporting that she was allowed to read the grand jury transcripts and she even reports some of the testimony from the one-sided process where there are no defense attorneys to offer up cross-examination. For the record, during the grand jury process, there are no defense attorneys, there are no probative questions concerning the truthfulness of the allegations being made, and there is no judge to keep his hands around the throat of prosecutors to keep them from lying or allowing others to lie on the stand. The nonsense that was allowed to go on during the grand jury process was discussed in a previous 3-part MJEOL Bullet. This is pure and utterly disgusting jury pool tainting at it’s finest. These set of prosecutors are so incredibly desperate to convict Jackson that they actually have the gall to try this non-existent “case” in the media like a bunch of wimpy-ass cry babies; afraid to actually take their medicine in a court of law and have their “witnesses” face Jackson’s attorneys’ blistering cross-examination.
No 7 Accusers in Jackson ‘Case’ – Majority of questioned boys deny abuse
Police Seek Additional Alleged Jackson Victims January 7, 2005 :camera VIDEO Exclusive: Just three weeks before the scheduled start of
Judge Wants Prosecutors to Stick to the Current Case
Judge Wants Prosecutors to Stick to the Current Case Wednesday, 12 January 2005 SANTA MARIA, CA Today, Santa Maria
Martin Bashir Doesn’t Want to Testify, Will Cite Shield Law – Fox
MJ Hearing Mulls Alleged Prior Offenses Wednesday, January 12, 2005 PHOTOS SANTA MARIA, Calif. Michael Jackson’s (search) prosecutors have
Judge Currently Refuses to Allow Old, Uproven Claims at Trial – UPDATE
BREAKING NEWS (Jan 12 2005) — The judge in the Michael Jackson “case” has refused to allow prosecutors to use
Accuser Spoke to Reporter in Jan 2004, Sea Cadet Corps – Flaghship News
Jan. 29, 2004 Naval station hosts Sea Cadets Corps BY JO2(SW/AW) TERRANCE JEFFERSON More than 40 sea cadets from the
Pt 3: Past Scams, Nonsensical Claims & a Lying, Controlling Mother MB#235
Pt 3: Past Scams, Nonsensical Claims & a Lying, Controlling Mother MJEOL Bullet #235 Jamie Masada has made public statements about the family that raise a number of questions. All this, while at least one news outlet reports of a unsupervised shopping spree with the accuser and his little brother in early 2004
JAN 11 2005 — While the prosecutions latest PR stunt involves convincing an unknowing public that there are other victims, they cant seem to get them all to actually testify against Jackson. In fact, more than a few of the ones prosecutors are reportedly looking at have already repeatedly denied that Michael Jackson molested them. At least 5 of these people–who prosecutors WANT to make “victims”–have never even alleged Jackson did anything to them at all, say sources and published reports. Some have even, reportedly, told the defense they are willing to testify for Jackson. It looks as if these latest reports are nothing more than frenzied and pathetic attempts to use unfounded tabloid gossip and unsubstantiated, one-sided speculation in the Jackson case against him. Some observers say that this case against Jackson may have evaporated when prosecutors found it necessary to leak sealed court documents to a website. While others suggest that prosecutors no longer want to dance with the family that brought them, and are now putting out feelers for other dance partners, so to speak. Whatever prosecutors decide to do, it seems like they are attempting to get out of this quicksand by digging themselves deeper in the hole. Not good. And try as they may, they still cant get away from the familys past, or the words of those who ran to the cameras pushing their sob-story.